Back Cover Progression

ribeyeIn writing, we often talk about “upping the stakes.” It’s an important principal to illuminate the idea of progression—that is, making the problem worse.

Fiction has conflict at its heart. Without conflict, there can be no fiction. Conflict is what drives us as humans, and hence, is what we’re most interested in. Fiction without conflict is more like summary.

Most writers begin with a single conflict in mind for their story. However, if they don’t progress the story beyond that conflict, the story falls flat. “Upping the stakes,” as it were, prevents that. It intensifies the central conflict, or adds an additional layer of conflict. How, you ask? Think of it like this:

Imagine we have a character, Jack, who loves steaks (see what I did there?). He goes to the fridge to grab a rib eye for dinner, and notices all his steaks are gone. See here, we have conflict. The character wants something, but something stands between him and his desire.

Now, let’s up the stakes. He calls his wife, Sarah. “Where are all our steaks?” he asks.
“I took them,” she says. “For Frank. I’m leaving you for him.”

Boom. Stakes have been upped. Now we from the simple to the complex. We can further complicate things, if you like. Let’s say, for example, Jack finds evidence to indicate that Frank is planning on offering Sarah as a human sacrifice to some strange demon at midnight that evening. Now there’s a ticking clock.

Though the idea sounds pretty far-fetched, you see the idea of progression. Try reading the back cover of your favorite books, and you’ll see what I mean. The progression of conflict is usually clear there.

Think of this classic example from one of my father’s earlier works, A Ship Possessed:
The USS Triggerfish–an American World War II submarine–has come home over fifty years after she was presumed lost in the Atlantic. Now her dark gray hulk lies embedded in the sand of a San Diego beach, her conning tower barely above the breaking surf. The submarine is in the wrong ocean, her crew is missing . . . And her half-century absence is a mystery that’s about to deepen. For the Triggerfish has returned, but she has not returned alone. Something is inside her — something unexpected and terrible. To J. D. Stanton, retired Navy captain and historian, falls the task of solving the mystery surrounding a ship possessed. What he is about to encounter will challenge his training, his wits, and his faith. Complicating his mission is a ruthless madman bent on obtaining a secret artifact stolen from the highest levels of the Nazi regime. And poised in the middle is a young woman, a lieutenant who must contend with invisible forces she never knew existed. A Ship Possessed is a story of faith, courage, and determination in the face of unexpected and unknown evil.

Notice the blue text. This is the dramatic set up, the original conflict. The red portions are the parts of the plot that layer in additional conflicts and complicate the original problem.

Or this one from his recently released novella, Plot Line:
Ray Beeman is a man in pursuit of a dream. With two published novels under his belt he knew he was on his way. Then his publisher went bankrupt. His future went dark. No money, no income, no profession. Could he start over? Yes, with the help of a stranger who offers him a dream job that allows him to continue writing. All he has to do is make up “PR” plot lines for a government agency. Not hard for a man with an active imagination. Dream jobs, Ray learns, often come with nightmares. Forced to see what no man should; forced to go where no person was meant to step; drawn across a threshold between worlds, Ray pays for his lucrative job with his sanity. Terrified as he is, he fears one fact more: His actions have put his family in peril.

Or this from my novel The Bargain due out in 2013:
Ten articles in eight days—a tall order for any journalist, even for Polk Award winner Connor Reedly. But with a dying wife and an empty bank account, the promised payment of $250,000 is hard to turn down. More so, his enigmatic employer, Mason Becker, has insinuated Connor’s acceptance of the job will result in a supernatural healing of his beloved wife.
The people of Hailey, California—the subjects of Connor’s charged articles—are a secretive group, not willing to open up to strangers. When shots are fired and Connor is running for his life, he demands Mason answer his questions: Why are the articles so important—is anyone going to publish them? Where is the money coming from? How can he be so confident that the completion of the articles will heal his wife?
Nothing in Connor’s vast journalistic adventures—not Katrina, not September 11th, not even his first-hand experience in the genocide in Darfur—could prepare him for the answers Mason gives. Now, it seems, the life of everyone in Hailey—including his wife’s—is in his hands.

Until next week, good writing.

14 Comments on Back Cover Progression

  1. Thickening the plot is what keeps the story going. It doesn’t always have to be as dramatic as some of these examples, but it does have to complicate things to some extent. Otherwise, the reader just gets fluff. Don’t assume your reader wants fluff. If they wanted fluff, they should have bought a pillow instead of a book.
    The contemporary fantasy author Jim Butcher is great at doing this. For example, his Dresden Files series tends to start with something relatively simple, such as a beautiful woman approaching the protagonist in search of help. Turns out she’s on the run. From an assassin. Who happens to be a vampire. Who has raised the stakes (no pun intended) to include everyone the main character loves in the mix.
    I once said somewhere on this blog that the story is like a treasure hunt, and the ending is the buried pirates’ booty. The details of the story are the sand you need to dig through. Got that image firm in your head? Good. As you dig through those details, you’re getting deeper. Don’t go in too deep all at once, but don’t let the ending sit there under a measly inch of sand, either.
    On a side note, your father’s works and your own mentioned in this post sound like interesting reads– I might look into picking those up in the near future!
    Write well, write often.

  2. Can’t wait to read your book. Sounds interesting…

  3. First, I would like to say that these books sound like interesting reads. Now, on topic, the writer can escalate the conflict, but I personally do not believe that it is necessary when writing fiction. There may be a time when simpler conflict can be best.

  4. Honestly this should just be common sense to anyone who wants to write any type of story. Without any type of conflict the story becomes dull and irrelivant. now the way conflict is set up is really important and really helps with the story telling i believe. but this really gave me some insight to how to really make a good conflict unfold.

  5. Hailee-Brooke Stewart | October 31, 2012 at 9:14 am | Reply

    Ive noticed in a lot of my writings there is no conflict, which leaves the story very dull and boring. Reading this has really helped me learn how to make the con flict really good and to make it jump at the reader. thank you <3

  6. I remember when you talked about getting a glass of water and how the conflict rises and more layers are added. Raising the stakes on the steaks made me laugh a bit. And sacrificing for a demon? Wow. (haha)

    I think the best stories always have many layers of conflict. It’s what sucks a reader in and makes them say, “Oh snap.”

    As Hailee said, sometimes my writing has only one level of conflict which leaves it pretty bland. I will be raising the stakes.

  7. Shania Sheehan | October 31, 2012 at 9:36 am | Reply

    Not only do you have to progress forward with the suspence in the story, you have to level out at some point. Resolve some problems and add new ones at the same time so that the suspence level stays the same but the reader doesn’t get bored.

  8. Jake Van Dusen | October 31, 2012 at 9:44 am | Reply

    first of all i see what you did there. also when i “up the steaks” it usually ends with a death of a main character. or a main charecter being lost or something else.

  9. Katelyn Haeckel | November 4, 2012 at 5:12 pm | Reply

    I’ve realized this before, but I seem to never have conflict in my stories .-. FLUFF!!! Fluff is boring… I need conflict…..

  10. I usually have some kind of conflict in my story but “upping my steaks” will make my writing a lot better. (:

  11. All these books sound very interesting and it makes me want to read all of them. Maybe by “upping me steaks” my writing will get a lot better and I would love reading my stories out loud in front of people. When I write my stories I usually don’t put a lot of conflict in or none at all, but maybe I will start putting the conflict in my stories to make them sound better.

  12. christopher rush | November 6, 2012 at 11:32 am | Reply

    i get this idea when i think of doing this i think of layers i should layer my conflicts with this.

  13. Miranda Almeida | November 6, 2012 at 11:56 am | Reply

    I like the idea of creating more conflict in stories becuase it keeps the story going. Conflict keeps the reader on their toes. Throughout the whole sotry, the reader is eager to find out how the characters will face their conflict, and they are nervous to find out if anything else will happen to the characters.

  14. Well thicking the plot is something everyone should know for writing, but this post was very informative.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*