Sneaky Prose Killers (repost)

More Halloween Clip Art Illustrations at http://www.ClipartOf.comI first posted this about 18 months ago, but thought it’d be good to put up again. I actually have the original bookmarked, and come back to it whenever I’m in the process of revising and editing. I find it a very helpful reminder of which words/phrases need to go. Here’s hoping the list helps you as much as it helps me. And, as always, good writing.


When I tell people I teach Creative Writing, they often have the same reaction. “How can you teach that? Isn’t it subjective? Who are you to tell someone their writing isn’t good?” But the subjectivity of writing should never serve as an excuse for mediocrity.

“You don’t like my story? Well, I love it, and that’s all that matters. Besides, writing is subjective! Everyone in my family loves it!”

Of course they do. They have to.

Here’s the story—different people enjoy different aspects of writing. Some champion plot to the determent of character and voice. Others elevate character over plot and voice. Still others hail voice as the preeminent aspect of good creative writing. However, the success of each of these three elements hinges on the level of prose. No amount of character, plot, or voice will make up for sloppy prolixity.

When revising, be mindful of sneaky words (specifically weak verbs, adverbs, and adjectives) that will undercut the tightness and quality of prose. My agent recently sent me a list of these words to hunt and eliminate in my current project. I thought I’d share it with you, as well as a brief explanation of why each word is the bane of editors nation-wide.

Watch/notice/observe/look: These weak verbs usually mean inactive characters. What’s more boring than watching paint dry? Reading about someone watching paint dry. “Notice” is often used to call reader’s attention to important information through the eyes of the character. But if we’re already in the eyes of that character, it simply becomes a superfluity.

Just: A sneaky adverb. Okay in dialog (rarely and sparingly), but virtually never in prose. Seldom is the word necessary, and it can be eliminated in most cases.

Then: While sometimes necessary, most prose will benefit if it’s eliminated. Especially bad when paired with other no-no words (i.e. “He walked toward her just then” contrasted with “He walked toward her”).

That: Another tricky one that is allowable in dialog sparingly. (i.e. “It’s not that bad.”) Most commonly, the word is used to introduce an dependent clause. Common grammarians will tell you to eliminate it in these cases (i.e. “He wanted her to know that he loved her” becomes “He wanted her to know he loved her”).

Feel/feeling/felt: These verbs are weak for the same reasons that watch, notice, and observe are. It indicates passivity, and often times creates a voice that’s more telling than showing. While a certain amount of telling is necessary to move the story forward, too much of it will get your novel thrown in the recycling bin. Instead, consider an action that shows the feeling. "She felt sad.” Becomes, “She folded her arms and turned her head from him.”

There: While necessary in some cases, this becomes prosaically offensive when followed by “is” or “was” or “were.” This construction indicates a sentence in the passive voice. Editors seldom appreciate the passive voice because it feels very telling. “There was a chair in the room” becomes “Oliver walked around the lone chair in the room.” If you’re still shaky on identifying the elusive passive voice, tune in next week. I’ll give you a short crash course in grammar to better elucidate the murky topic.

Knew/know: Again indicates a passive character. Sometimes necessary, but could be indicative of a needed change.

Maybe: You’ll see this pop up in dialog, but it should be avoided in nearly every instance of exposition. The word weakens the power of the prose by making it wishy-washy. Most often, writers use this while establishing interior monolog. “Maybe he was mad at her” (passive) “He had no right to be mad at her” (active). Both reveal the inner workings of the characters mind, but the latter carries a stronger emotive context.

See/saw: See notice/watch/observe. “He saw Lauren smile” becomes “Lauren smiled.” We know the characters saw this, so the introductory clause is superfluous.

Hear/heard: See above. “He heard a shrill whistle of a train deep in the foothills” becomes “A train whistle shrilled deep in the foothills.” The reader understands that the character hears this, so the set up of “he heard” becomes unnecessary.

Could/couldn’t: A word that generally accompanies see, notice, hear, etc. “He could see the tops of her slippers” becomes “Snow and ice crusted the tops of her slippers.” The elimination of this word provides more opportunities to show rather than tell.

“ly” adverbs: See my earlier post here.

Was/were: Generally indicate passive voice, which you know by now is a no-no.

For fun, go through your current project and do a word find on these. Which of these do you abuse the most? If I had a dime for every time I used “just” or “that,” I would quit my day job.

7 thoughts on “Sneaky Prose Killers (repost)”

  • I use those words A LOT. I keep forgeting which words you shouldn’t use. definitely printing this out and keeping it in my notebook.

  • The passive voice is a sneaky foe. We’re all guilty of slipping into it every once in a while, but the key is to go back and edit, edit, edit. And when you think you’re done editing a certain piece or part of a larger project? Go edit something else. Kill that passive voice. Kill it with fire. And lightning. And zombies. Zombies are fun.
    I avoid these words whenever I can, but there are a lot that slip past me. And that’s why I edit again and again. And if you can’t think of a better way to say what you’re trying to get across, highlight it or underline it. Come back to it later. As your writing develops, the right words will come.
    Write well, write often.

  • I have copied and pasted this into my flash drive, I will have to be more careful of my writing in the future. Some of these I figured out on my own but some I needed to have pointed out to me.

  • This blog post opened my eyes to how I can make my writing so much stronger by eliminating passive, filler words. I remember when I was younger by mom used to tell me to take out the “thats” and the “thens”, and I thought it sounded funny at the time. Out of habit, I avoid using “that” and “then” too often, but there are a handful of words i can avoid to make my writing more convicting and fluent.

  • Most of the words you used on this blog I use a lot in my writings and I don’t know how to write a good story without them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *